这篇文章主要介绍SpringCache框架加载/拦截原理的示例分析,文中介绍的非常详细,具有一定的参考价值,感兴趣的小伙伴们一定要看完!
背景
项目A中需要多数据源的实现,比如UserDao.getAllUserList() 需要从readonly库中读取,但是UserDao.insert() 需要插入主(写)库
就需要在dao层的方法调用上面添加注解!
了解后知道-接口通过jdk代理(mybatis的mapper接口就是通过jdk代理动态生成的-> MapperFactoryBean.class )的,没办法被aop的拦截(注解配置的拦截)
//dao @Pointcut("@annotation(com.kaola.cs.data.common.aspect.DataSourceSelect)") public void dao() { }
然后碰巧接触了项目B,使用了SpringCache模块,但是Spring的Cache模块居然能够拦截(spring-cache也是通过注解拦截!!!)
引起了我的兴趣,就把源码翻了一遍
SpringCache的用途
与 mybatis 对比
1. spring-cache 是基于spring的方法级别的,也就是说你方法做了啥不关心,它只负责缓存方法结果
mybatis 的缓存(CachingExecutor / BaseExecutor) 是基于数据库查询结果的缓存
2. spring-cache 可以配置各种类型的缓存介质(redis , ehcache , hashmap, 甚至db等等) -> 它仅仅是提供接口和默认实现,可以自己拓展
mybatis 的缓存是hashmap,单一!!lowb
SpringCache 的配置
1.注解(spring-boot) 2.xml配置
这里只讲注解,但是初始化的类都是一样的!!!
定义 CacheConfigure.java 就能直接使用
@EnableCaching @Configuration public class CacheConfigure extends CachingConfigurerSupport { @Override @Bean public CacheManager cacheManager() { SimpleCacheManager result = new SimpleCacheManager(); List<Cache> caches = new ArrayList<>(); caches.add(new ConcurrentMapCache("testCache")); result.setCaches(caches); return result; } @Override @Bean public CacheErrorHandler errorHandler() { return new SimpleCacheErrorHandler(); } }
通过 @EnableCaching 注解可以找到 Spring-Cache 初始化的核心类
ProxyCachingConfiguration.java
@Configuration @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE) public class ProxyCachingConfiguration extends AbstractCachingConfiguration { @Bean(name = CacheManagementConfigUtils.CACHE_ADVISOR_BEAN_NAME) @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE) public BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor cacheAdvisor() { BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor advisor = new BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor(); advisor.setCacheOperationSource(cacheOperationSource()); advisor.setAdvice(cacheInterceptor()); if (this.enableCaching != null) { advisor.setOrder(this.enableCaching.<Integer>getNumber("order")); } return advisor; } @Bean @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE) public CacheOperationSource cacheOperationSource() { return new AnnotationCacheOperationSource(); } @Bean @Role(BeanDefinition.ROLE_INFRASTRUCTURE) public CacheInterceptor cacheInterceptor() { CacheInterceptor interceptor = new CacheInterceptor(); interceptor.configure(this.errorHandler, this.keyGenerator, this.cacheResolver, this.cacheManager); interceptor.setCacheOperationSource(cacheOperationSource()); return interceptor; } }
通过注解,把3个类的bean 实例化: BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor 、CacheOperationSource 、CacheInterceptor
说一下这3个类的作用
BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor.java
/* BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor 继承了 AbstractBeanFactoryPointcutAdvisor 在spring 中的效果就是,在每个bean的初始化时 (每个bean都会被加载成 advised 对象 -> 有 targetSource 和 Advisor[] 数组) 每个bean被调用方法的时候都是先遍历advisor的方法,然后在调用原生bean(也就是targetSource)的方法,实现了aop的效果 bean 加载的时候 BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor 的 getPointcut()-> 也就是 CacheOperationSourcePointcut 就会被获取,然后调用 CacheOperationSourcePointcut.matches()方法, 用来匹配对应的bean 假设bean 在 BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor 的扫描中 matchs() 方法返回了true 结果就是 在每个bean的方法被调用的时候 CacheInterceptor 中的 invoke() 方法就会被调用 总结: spring-cache 也完成了aop一样的实现(spring-aop也是这样做的) 重点就是在 CacheOperationSourcePointcut.matchs() 方法中,怎么匹配接口的了 这里先不说后面具体介绍!!!! */ public class BeanFactoryCacheOperationSourceAdvisor extends AbstractBeanFactoryPointcutAdvisor { @Nullable private CacheOperationSource cacheOperationSource; private final CacheOperationSourcePointcut pointcut = new CacheOperationSourcePointcut() { @Override @Nullable protected CacheOperationSource getCacheOperationSource() { return cacheOperationSource; } }; /** * Set the cache operation attribute source which is used to find cache * attributes. This should usually be identical to the source reference * set on the cache interceptor itself. */ public void setCacheOperationSource(CacheOperationSource cacheOperationSource) { this.cacheOperationSource = cacheOperationSource; } /** * Set the {@link ClassFilter} to use for this pointcut. * Default is {@link ClassFilter#TRUE}. */ public void setClassFilter(ClassFilter classFilter) { this.pointcut.setClassFilter(classFilter); } @Override public Pointcut getPointcut() { return this.pointcut; } }
CacheOperationSource.java 是个接口
实现类是 -> AnnotationCacheOperationSource.java 重点是父类 -> AbstractFallbackCacheOperationSource.java
讲解一下:
代码量很少,主要是 attributeCache 的封装使用,通过把 method - CacheOperation
然后在 CacheInterceptor.invoke() 的时候通过invocation 获取到 method-class 然后调用CacheOperationSource.getCacheOperations() 获取到 CacheOperation
CacheOperation 其实就是触发对应spring-cache 注解的操作-获取缓存的实现了
public abstract class AbstractFallbackCacheOperationSource implements CacheOperationSource { /** * Canonical value held in cache to indicate no caching attribute was * found for this method and we don't need to look again. */ private static final Collection<CacheOperation> NULL_CACHING_ATTRIBUTE = Collections.emptyList(); /** * Logger available to subclasses. * <p>As this base class is not marked Serializable, the logger will be recreated * after serialization - provided that the concrete subclass is Serializable. */ protected final Log logger = LogFactory.getLog(getClass()); /** * Cache of CacheOperations, keyed by method on a specific target class. * <p>As this base class is not marked Serializable, the cache will be recreated * after serialization - provided that the concrete subclass is Serializable. */ private final Map<Object, Collection<CacheOperation>> attributeCache = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(1024); /** * Determine the caching attribute for this method invocation. * <p>Defaults to the class's caching attribute if no method attribute is found. * @param method the method for the current invocation (never {@code null}) * @param targetClass the target class for this invocation (may be {@code null}) * @return {@link CacheOperation} for this method, or {@code null} if the method * is not cacheable */ @Override @Nullable public Collection<CacheOperation> getCacheOperations(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) { if (method.getDeclaringClass() == Object.class) { return null; } Object cacheKey = getCacheKey(method, targetClass); Collection<CacheOperation> cached = this.attributeCache.get(cacheKey); if (cached != null) { return (cached != NULL_CACHING_ATTRIBUTE ? cached : null); } else { Collection<CacheOperation> cacheOps = computeCacheOperations(method, targetClass); if (cacheOps != null) { if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) { logger.trace("Adding cacheable method '" + method.getName() + "' with attribute: " + cacheOps); } this.attributeCache.put(cacheKey, cacheOps); } else { this.attributeCache.put(cacheKey, NULL_CACHING_ATTRIBUTE); } return cacheOps; } } /** * Determine a cache key for the given method and target class. * <p>Must not produce same key for overloaded methods. * Must produce same key for different instances of the same method. * @param method the method (never {@code null}) * @param targetClass the target class (may be {@code null}) * @return the cache key (never {@code null}) */ protected Object getCacheKey(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) { return new MethodClassKey(method, targetClass); } @Nullable private Collection<CacheOperation> computeCacheOperations(Method method, @Nullable Class<?> targetClass) { // Don't allow no-public methods as required. if (allowPublicMethodsOnly() && !Modifier.isPublic(method.getModifiers())) { return null; } // The method may be on an interface, but we need attributes from the target class. // If the target class is null, the method will be unchanged. Method specificMethod = AopUtils.getMostSpecificMethod(method, targetClass); // First try is the method in the target class. Collection<CacheOperation> opDef = findCacheOperations(specificMethod); if (opDef != null) { return opDef; } // Second try is the caching operation on the target class. opDef = findCacheOperations(specificMethod.getDeclaringClass()); if (opDef != null && ClassUtils.isUserLevelMethod(method)) { return opDef; } if (specificMethod != method) { // Fallback is to look at the original method. opDef = findCacheOperations(method); if (opDef != null) { return opDef; } // Last fallback is the class of the original method. opDef = findCacheOperations(method.getDeclaringClass()); if (opDef != null && ClassUtils.isUserLevelMethod(method)) { return opDef; } } return null; } /** * Subclasses need to implement this to return the caching attribute for the * given class, if any. * @param clazz the class to retrieve the attribute for * @return all caching attribute associated with this class, or {@code null} if none */ @Nullable protected abstract Collection<CacheOperation> findCacheOperations(Class<?> clazz); /** * Subclasses need to implement this to return the caching attribute for the * given method, if any. * @param method the method to retrieve the attribute for * @return all caching attribute associated with this method, or {@code null} if none */ @Nullable protected abstract Collection<CacheOperation> findCacheOperations(Method method); /** * Should only public methods be allowed to have caching semantics? * <p>The default implementation returns {@code false}. */ protected boolean allowPublicMethodsOnly() { return false; } }
!!!! CacheOperationSourcePointcut.java 的 matchs() 方法
用来判断类是不是符合spring-cache 拦截条件 也就是 @Cachable @CachePut 等等的注解怎么识别的地方
经过跟踪代码发现是 AnnotationCacheOperationSource.findCacheOperations() 调用的
省略部分代码....
public class AnnotationCacheOperationSource extends AbstractFallbackCacheOperationSource implements Serializable { private final Set<CacheAnnotationParser> annotationParsers; @Override @Nullable protected Collection<CacheOperation> findCacheOperations(Class<?> clazz) { return determineCacheOperations(parser -> parser.parseCacheAnnotations(clazz)); } @Override @Nullable protected Collection<CacheOperation> findCacheOperations(Method method) { return determineCacheOperations(parser -> parser.parseCacheAnnotations(method)); } /** * Determine the cache operation(s) for the given {@link CacheOperationProvider}. * <p>This implementation delegates to configured * {@link CacheAnnotationParser CacheAnnotationParsers} * for parsing known annotations into Spring's metadata attribute class. * <p>Can be overridden to support custom annotations that carry caching metadata. * @param provider the cache operation provider to use * @return the configured caching operations, or {@code null} if none found */ @Nullable protected Collection<CacheOperation> determineCacheOperations(CacheOperationProvider provider) { Collection<CacheOperation> ops = null; for (CacheAnnotationParser annotationParser : this.annotationParsers) { Collection<CacheOperation> annOps = provider.getCacheOperations(annotationParser); if (annOps != null) { if (ops == null) { ops = annOps; } else { Collection<CacheOperation> combined = new ArrayList<>(ops.size() + annOps.size()); combined.addAll(ops); combined.addAll(annOps); ops = combined; } } } return ops; } }
然后就是注解的解析方法 SpringCacheAnnotationParser.java
代码很简单-就不多说了
@Nullable private Collection<CacheOperation> parseCacheAnnotations( DefaultCacheConfig cachingConfig, AnnotatedElement ae, boolean localOnly) { Collection<? extends Annotation> anns = (localOnly ? AnnotatedElementUtils.getAllMergedAnnotations(ae, CACHE_OPERATION_ANNOTATIONS) : AnnotatedElementUtils.findAllMergedAnnotations(ae, CACHE_OPERATION_ANNOTATIONS)); if (anns.isEmpty()) { return null; } final Collection<CacheOperation> ops = new ArrayList<>(1); anns.stream().filter(ann -> ann instanceof Cacheable).forEach( ann -> ops.add(parseCacheableAnnotation(ae, cachingConfig, (Cacheable) ann))); anns.stream().filter(ann -> ann instanceof CacheEvict).forEach( ann -> ops.add(parseEvictAnnotation(ae, cachingConfig, (CacheEvict) ann))); anns.stream().filter(ann -> ann instanceof CachePut).forEach( ann -> ops.add(parsePutAnnotation(ae, cachingConfig, (CachePut) ann))); anns.stream().filter(ann -> ann instanceof Caching).forEach( ann -> parseCachingAnnotation(ae, cachingConfig, (Caching) ann, ops)); return ops; }
总结
1.spring-cache 实现了 AbstractBeanFactoryPointcutAdvisor 提供 CacheOperationSourcePointcut (PointCut) 作切点判断,提供 CacheInterceptor (MethodInterceptor) 作方法拦截
2.spring-cache 提供 CacheOperationSource 作为 method 对应 CacheOperation(缓存操作) 的查询和加载
3.spring-cache 通过 SpringCacheAnnotationParser 来解析自己定义的 @Cacheable @CacheEvict @Caching 等注解类
所以 spring-cache 不使用 aspectj 的方式,通过 CacheOperationSource.getCacheOperations() 方式可以使jdk代理的类也能匹配到
jdk代理的类的匹配
代码类在 CacheOperationSource.getCacheOperations()
重点在于 targetClass 和 method ,如果是对应的 dao.xxx() 就能matchs() 并且拦截
CacheInterceptor -> CacheAspectSupport.execute() 方法
// 代码自己看吧。也很简单 -> 结果就是spring-cache 也可以拦截到mybatis的dao层接口,进行缓存 @Nullable protected Object execute(CacheOperationInvoker invoker, Object target, Method method, Object[] args) { // Check whether aspect is enabled (to cope with cases where the AJ is pulled in automatically) if (this.initialized) { Class<?> targetClass = getTargetClass(target); CacheOperationSource cacheOperationSource = getCacheOperationSource(); if (cacheOperationSource != null) { Collection<CacheOperation> operations = cacheOperationSource.getCacheOperations(method, targetClass); if (!CollectionUtils.isEmpty(operations)) { return execute(invoker, method, new CacheOperationContexts(operations, method, args, target, targetClass)); } } } return invoker.invoke(); }
以上是“SpringCache框架加载/拦截原理的示例分析”这篇文章的所有内容,感谢各位的阅读!希望分享的内容对大家有帮助,更多相关知识,欢迎关注亿速云行业资讯频道!
免责声明:本站发布的内容(图片、视频和文字)以原创、转载和分享为主,文章观点不代表本网站立场,如果涉及侵权请联系站长邮箱:is@yisu.com进行举报,并提供相关证据,一经查实,将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。