温馨提示×

温馨提示×

您好,登录后才能下订单哦!

密码登录×
登录注册×
其他方式登录
点击 登录注册 即表示同意《亿速云用户服务条款》

两个会话分别只执行一个SQL会不会形成死锁

发布时间:2021-11-29 14:40:33 来源:亿速云 阅读:144 作者:柒染 栏目:关系型数据库

这篇文章给大家介绍两个会话分别只执行一个SQL会不会形成死锁,内容非常详细,感兴趣的小伙伴们可以参考借鉴,希望对大家能有所帮助。

1,问题
   两个会话分别只执行一个SQL,可能形成死锁吗?

2,测试设想
   对于一个大表(比如100万条记录),两个会话分别从一个大表的两端(头、尾)更新,就可能形成互相等待对方已占有资源的情况,从而形成死锁。

3,测试
3.1测试版本:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE    11.2.0.3.0      Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

3.2 创建测试用表
create table tmp_x(x int,y int);

插入数据:
insert into tmp_x
select rownum,rownum
from dual
connect by level<1e6+1;

创建索引:
create index idx_tmp_x_x on tmp_x(x);

收集统计信息:
begin
  dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'TMP_X');
end;
/  


3.3测试
--会话1

查看执行计划:
explain plan for update /*+ index_asc(t idx_tmp_x_x) */ tmp_x t set y=1 where x>1;
select * from table(dbms_xplan.display(null,null,'Advanced'));
Plan hash value: 4167283686
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation         | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT  |             |   999K|  9765K|  4340   (2)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  UPDATE           | TMP_X       |       |       |            |          |
|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN| IDX_TMP_X_X |   999K|  9765K|  2254   (2)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
   2 - access("X">1)
Column Projection Information (identified by operation id):
-----------------------------------------------------------
   2 - (upd=3; cmp=2) "T".ROWID[ROWID,10], "X"[NUMBER,22], "Y"[NUMBER,22]



执行SQL:
update /*+ index_asc(t idx_tmp_x_x) */ tmp_x t set y=1 where x>1;



--会话2

查看执行计划(使用提示index_desc,CARDINALITY):
explain plan for update /*+ index_desc(t idx_tmp_x_x) CARDINALITY(t 1000) */ tmp_x t set y=2 where x<1e6;

select * from table(dbms_xplan.display(null,null,'Advanced'));
Plan hash value: 2352573976
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                    | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | UPDATE STATEMENT             |             |  1000 | 10000 |  4340   (2)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  UPDATE                      | TMP_X       |       |       |            |          |
|*  2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN DESCENDING| IDX_TMP_X_X |  1000 | 10000 |  2254   (2)| 00:00:01 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
   2 - access("X"<1e6)
       filter("X"<1e6)


执行SQL:
update /*+ index_desc(t idx_tmp_x_x) CARDINALITY(t 1000) */ tmp_x t set y=2 where x<1e6;



---会话3
查看会话1,2的等待事件:
select sid,event,blocking_session from v$session where sid in (1894,2324);

       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 SQL*Net message from client   
      2324 SQL*Net message from client   

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 gc current request            
      2324 db file sequential read       

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 db file scattered read        
      2324 gc current request            

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 gc current multi block reques
      2324 db file scattered read        

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 gc current request            
      2324 gc current request            

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 gc current request            
      2324 db file sequential read       

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 db file sequential read       
      2324 db file scattered read        

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 log buffer space              
      2324 log buffer space              

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 gc current request            
      2324 gc current request            

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 enq: TX - row lock contention
      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 enq: TX - row lock contention             2324
      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention             1894

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 enq: TX - row lock contention             2324
      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention             1894

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 enq: TX - row lock contention             2324
      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention             1894

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 enq: TX - row lock contention             2324
      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention

SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 enq: TX - row lock contention             2324
      2324 enq: TX - row lock contention


SQL> /
       SID EVENT                         BLOCKING_SESSION
---------- ----------------------------- ----------------
      1894 enq: TX - row lock contention
      2324 SQL*Net message from client   



--会话1
update /*+ index_asc(t idx_tmp_x_x) */ tmp_x t set y=1 where x>1
                                       *
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource

3.4测试结论
  两个会话分别只执行一个SQL,也可能形成死锁。

关于两个会话分别只执行一个SQL会不会形成死锁就分享到这里了,希望以上内容可以对大家有一定的帮助,可以学到更多知识。如果觉得文章不错,可以把它分享出去让更多的人看到。

向AI问一下细节

免责声明:本站发布的内容(图片、视频和文字)以原创、转载和分享为主,文章观点不代表本网站立场,如果涉及侵权请联系站长邮箱:is@yisu.com进行举报,并提供相关证据,一经查实,将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。

sql
AI