ASA8.4policy-map接口和全局执行的优先级测试：

一.概述：

   QQ群里面有网友讨论ASA防火墙的policy-map的global和interface的执行顺序，从字面意思可以看出这两种的应用范围是不一样的，一个是全局调用，一个只在接口下调用，因此觉得是详细的interface被优先调用，为了确认自己的想法，决定搭建环境验证一下。

二.基本思路：

A.不相冲突的policy-map估计会被全局和接口的service-policy先后调用执行，看不出效果
B.只能用相冲突的policy-map，在全局和接口的service-policy中同时调用，看最终哪个生效
C.全局和接口的policy-map执行范围是不一样的，估计接口的policy-map会被优先调用执行，顺序可能为：
①.先执行接口的service-policy，并调用对应的policy-map，如果被匹配，则不执行全局的service-policy
②.如果不被接口的policy-map所匹配，则会接着执行全局的service-policy，并调用对应的policy-map
----经过测试，发现跟想象的有点区别：如果被接口policy-map审查通过，是会送到全局policy-map的；除非被接口的class-map的ACL丢弃，或者被审查后丢弃。

三.测试拓扑：
        10.1.1.0/24(Inside)                  200.100.1.0/24(Outside)
PC1(.8)----------------------(.1)ASA842(.1)----------------------------(.8)PC2
                                                                     web服务器端口为：2000

四.基本配置：

A.PC1:

IP:10.1.1.8/24 ,GW:10.1.1.1

B.ASA842防火墙：

①接口配置：

interface GigabitEthernet0
nameif Inside
security-level 100
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0

no shut

interface GigabitEthernet1
nameif Outside
security-level 0
ip address 202.100.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shut

②动态PAT配置：

object network Inside.net
subnet 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
object network Inside.net
nat (Inside,Outside) dynamic interface

③静态PAT配置：

object network Inside.pc1
host 10.1.1.8
object network Inside.pc1
nat (Inside,Outside) static interface service tcp 2000 2000

④策略设置：

access-list outside extended permit tcp any object Inside.pc1 eq 2000
access-group outside in interface Outside

五.测试步骤：

A.验证此时外网是否能正常访问内部web服务器：

----无法访问，因为默认全局策略开启了skinny审查

B.配置outside接口的policy-map并调用：

access-list web2000 extended permit tcp any object Inside_pc1 eq 2000

class-map web2000
match access-list web2000

policy-map web2000
class web2000
 inspect http
service-policy web2000 interface Outside

C.验证此时外网是否能正常访问内部web服务器：

---仍然无法访问

ciscoasa# show service-policy
Global policy:
 Service-policy: global_policy
   Class-map: inspection_default
     .....省略部分..................
     Inspect: ip-options _default_ip_options_map, packet 0, drop 0, reset-drop 0
     Inspect: skinny , packet 4, drop 1, reset-drop 0
              tcp-proxy: bytes in buffer 0, bytes dropped 0
Interface Outside:
 Service-policy: web2000
   Class-map: web2000
     Inspect: http, packet 4, drop 0, reset-drop 0

---可以看到，数据包虽然被接口下class-map审查合格后放行，但是却被全局下的class-map丢弃。

D.调整outside接口的policy-map并调用：

access-list outside_skinny extended deny tcp any object Inside_pc1 eq 2000
access-list outside_skinny extended permit tcp any any eq 2000

class-map outside_skinny
match access-list outside_skinny

policy-map outside_skinny
class outside_skinny
 inspect skinny  

no service-policy web2000 interface outside

service-policy outside_skinny interface Outside

E.验证此时外网是否能正常访问内部web服务器：

---可以正常访问

访问之前，clear  service-policy，访问完成之后再查看：

ciscoasa# show service-policy
Global policy:
 Service-policy: global_policy
   Class-map: inspection_default
     .....省略部分..................

     Inspect: ip-options _default_ip_options_map, packet 0, drop 0, reset-drop 0
     Inspect: skinny , packet 0, drop 0, reset-drop 0
              tcp-proxy: bytes in buffer 0, bytes dropped 0
Interface Outside:
 Service-policy: outside_skinny
   Class-map: outside_skinny
     Inspect: skinny , packet 0, drop 0, reset-drop 0
              tcp-proxy: bytes in buffer 0, bytes dropped 0

----可以发现访问前后全局和接口的class-map都没有被匹配

F.调整全局和接口policy-map：

①接口：

access-list outside_skinny extended permit tcp any any eq 2000

class-map outside_skinny
match access-list outside_skinny

policy-map outside_skinny
class outside_skinny
 inspect skinny  
service-policy outside_skinny interface Outside

②全局：

access-list global_skinny extended deny tcp any object Inside_pc1 eq 2000
access-list global_skinny extended permit tcp any any eq 2000
class-map global_skinny
match access-list global_skinny
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
 no inspect skinny
class global_skinny
service-policy global_policy global

③测试:

----无法访问，被outside接口的policy-map拒绝

ciscoasa# show service-policy
Global policy:
 Service-policy: global_policy
   Class-map: inspection_default
     ........省略部分..............
     Inspect: ip-options _default_ip_options_map, packet 0, drop 0, reset-drop 0
   Class-map: global_skinny
     Inspect: skinny , packet 0, drop 0, reset-drop 0
              tcp-proxy: bytes in buffer 0, bytes dropped 0
Interface Outside:
 Service-policy: outside_skinny
   Class-map: outside_skinny
     Inspect: skinny , packet 4, drop 1, reset-drop 0
              tcp-proxy: bytes in buffer 0, bytes dropped 0

----可以看到，因为outside的ACL没有明确拒绝流量，所以被匹配，并检测到不是skinny流量而被丢弃

G.再次调整全局和接口的policy-map：

①接口：

access-list outside_skinny extended deny tcp any object Inside_pc1 eq 2000

access-list outside_skinny extended permit tcp any any eq 2000
class-map outside_skinny
match access-list outside_skinny
policy-map outside_skinny
class outside_skinny
 inspect skinny  
service-policy outside_skinny interface Outside

②全局：

access-list global_skinny extended permit tcp any any eq 2000

class-map global_skinny
match access-list global_skinny

policy-map global_policy

class global_skinny
 inspect skinny  
service-policy global_policy global

③测试:

----可以正常访问

ciscoasa# show service-policy

Global policy:
 Service-policy: global_policy
   Class-map: inspection_default
     .......省略部分....................
     Inspect: ip-options _default_ip_options_map, packet 0, drop 0, reset-drop 0
   Class-map: global_skinny
     Inspect: skinny , packet 0, drop 0, reset-drop 0
              tcp-proxy: bytes in buffer 0, bytes dropped 0
Interface Outside:
 Service-policy: outside_skinny
   Class-map: outside_skinny
     Inspect: skinny , packet 0, drop 0, reset-drop 0
              tcp-proxy: bytes in buffer 0, bytes dropped 0

----可以发现outside接口的ACL配置了拒绝后，不会去匹配全局的policy-map。

六.总结：

A.处理顺序：先接口再全局

B.是否会送到全局：如果没有被接口policy-map匹配，或被接口policy-map审查通过，会被送到全局

-----被ACL丢弃，或审查后被丢弃，都不会去匹配全局policy-map